 |
| Russian service men On a parade at the red square. |
There's only one real way to compare military strength, and thankfully the world hasn't had many opportunities lately.
Despite the potential
powder keg in the South China Sea,
standoffs in Ukraine, and
proxy wars throughout the Middle East,
inter-state warfare between the world's military powers has been all
but banished from the global scene (for the time being, at least).
For a simpler evaluation of military power, we turned to the
Global Firepower Index,
a ranking of 106 nations based on more than 50 factors including
overall military budget, available manpower, and the amount of equipment
each country has in its respective arsenal, as well as access to
natural resources.
The index focuses on quantity, ignoring significant qualitative differences — North Korea's 78 submarines, for instance,
aren't exactly state of the art. It also does not factor in
nuclear stockpiles,
which are still the ultimate trump card in geopolitics. And it doesn't
penalize landlocked nations for lack of a standing navy.
We've created a chart to compare the top 35 militaries according to
the Global Firepower Index. The ranking was released in April (before
events like the Russian invasion of Eastern Ukraine in August, ISIS's
blitz through Iraq, and the flare-up between Israel and Hamas) and
involves a complex set of data that is subject to ongoing adjustments
and corrections.
Here Are The Key Findings From The Index:
America's investment in being the world's leading military force.
The US clearly leads the world in military spending at more than $600
billion a year. China is in a distant second, at nearly $130 billion —
less than one-third of America's overall spending.
According to a report from the
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI),
the US has reduced its defense budget by 7.8% chiefly because of
America's gradual withdrawal in overseas military operations, such as in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
Russia, meanwhile, has increased its arms spending by $88 billion and
plans to "modernize" its arsenal.
Aircraft carriers are key, and very few countries have one.
Aircraft carriers contribute greatly to a country's overall military strength. These massive vessels allow nations to
project their force
far beyond their borders and across the entire face of the globe.
They're essentially mobile naval and air force bases. Aircraft carriers
can also carry drones,
which significantly change the global surveillance game.
The US's absolute monopoly on
super-carrier vessels significantly boosts the country's forward operating power. The US has
deployed
an aircraft carrier toward the Persian Gulf to bolster its sea and air
power before possible strikes against ISIS in Iraq. Russia has
previously deployed an aircraft carrier to the Mediterranean to display its seriousness in propping up Assad in Syria.
North Korea's useless submarines.
An anomaly in the Global Firepower index is North Korea's ranking as a
world leader for submarines. And while it's true that Pyongyang
commands the largest submarine fleet on earth, most of these vessels are
unusable.
A third of North Korea's subs are noisy diesel-powered Romeos, which have been
obsolete since 1961.
These submarines have a weapons range of only four miles, whereas a
modern US submarine has a range of 150 miles. This fleet is
unsophisticated but still durable, according to the US Department of Defense.
No comments:
Post a Comment